Skip to content

MCP Integration

Stitcher ships as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server, so AI coding assistants like Claude Code can use it as a tool during project planning.

Setup

Global (all projects)

Add stitcher to your global Claude Code config. If you've installed via pip or uv tool install:

claude mcp add --scope user stitcher stitcher-mcp

Or using uvx (no install needed — fetches from PyPI on first run):

claude mcp add --scope user stitcher uvx stitcher-scout stitcher-mcp

Per-project

Add to .mcp.json at your project root:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "stitcher": {
      "command": "stitcher-mcp"
    }
  }
}

With API keys

If your keys aren't in the shell environment, pass them via the MCP config:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "stitcher": {
      "command": "stitcher-mcp",
      "env": {
        "GITHUB_TOKEN": "github_pat_...",
        "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "sk-ant-..."
      }
    }
  }
}

After configuring, restart Claude Code. The scout tool will appear in the available tools list.

Tool interface

The MCP server exposes a single tool:

scout

Search GitHub for real, working code relevant to a project description.

Parameters:

Name Type Required Description
description string Yes What you want to build — describe the project or feature.
repo string No Path or GitHub URL to an existing repo for context.
mode string No "fast" (default) or "deep" (iterative refinement).
model string No LLM model override (e.g., "gpt-4o"). Uses config default if not set.
save_report string No Directory path to write a .md report file.
generate_brief boolean No When true, include a research brief and starter dependency manifest in the response.
brief_language string No Target language for the dependency manifest (e.g., "python", "rust"). Auto-detected if not set.

Returns: JSON string with:

{
  "project_understanding": "Summary of what you're building",
  "subproblems": [
    {
      "subproblem": "Core libraries and frameworks",
      "recommended": [
        {
          "repo": "owner/repo-name",
          "url": "https://github.com/owner/repo-name",
          "description": "...",
          "stars": 2500,
          "forks": 180,
          "language": "Rust",
          "relevance_score": 0.85,
          "quality_score": 0.78,
          "repo_quality_score": 0.82,
          "summary": "What this repo does and why it's relevant",
          "caveats": "Things to be aware of",
          "relevant_files": [
            {
              "path": "src/core/parser.rs",
              "start_line": 42,
              "end_line": 120,
              "explanation": "Core parsing logic"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "unexpected_findings": ["Interesting discoveries"],
  "gaps": ["Sub-problems with no good results"]
}

If save_report is provided, the response also includes "report_file": "/path/to/report.md".

When generate_brief is true, the response also includes:

{
  "research_brief": "# Research Brief\n...",
  "deps_manifest": "# requirements.txt — generated from scout results\n..."
}

Usage examples

Once configured, Claude Code can use stitcher during conversations:

Direct request:

"Use the scout tool to find implementations of real-time collaborative editing in TypeScript"

During project planning:

"I want to build a GPU cluster scheduler. Research what's out there on GitHub before we start."

With report output:

"Search for OAuth2 PKCE implementations and save the report to ./research/"

With project context:

"Scout for notification system implementations, using our repo for context"

With research brief:

"Search for authentication libraries and generate a research brief with dependency recommendations"

How it works with agents

When an AI agent calls the scout tool, the full pipeline runs: decomposition, search, code evaluation, and (in deep mode) refinement. The structured JSON response gives the agent detailed information about each recommended repo, including specific files and line ranges to examine.

This is useful for:

  • Project planning — understanding what already exists before building
  • Architecture decisions — finding proven patterns and implementations
  • Library discovery — finding the right dependencies for a new project
  • Due diligence — evaluating the ecosystem around a technology